Society of St. Pius X - Revision history

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€“" to "-"

2022-12-13T08:58:38Z

Text replacement - "â€“" to "-"

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:58, 13 December 2022
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:; [http://canonlawmadeeasy.com/2013/08/01/are-sspx-sacraments-valid-part-i/ "Are SSPX Sacraments Valid?"]		:; [http://canonlawmadeeasy.com/2013/08/01/are-sspx-sacraments-valid-part-i/ "Are SSPX Sacraments Valid?"]

	:: As long as the Society [of Saint Pius X] does not have a canonical status in the Church, its ministers do not exercise legitimate ministries in the Churchâ€¦. In order to make this clear once again: until the doctrinal questions are clarified, the Society has no canonical status in the Church, and its ministers ~~â€“~~ even though they have been freed of the ecclesiastical penalty ~~â€“~~ do not legitimately exercise any ministry in the Church.		:: As long as the Society [of Saint Pius X] does not have a canonical status in the Church, its ministers do not exercise legitimate ministries in the Churchâ€¦. In order to make this clear once again: until the doctrinal questions are clarified, the Society has no canonical status in the Church, and its ministers - even though they have been freed of the ecclesiastical penalty - do not legitimately exercise any ministry in the Church.

	== References ==		== References ==

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€" to "”"

2022-12-10T09:21:24Z

Text replacement - "â€" to "”"

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 10 December 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:: The Masses offered by priests of the society are valid. Other Sacraments celebrated in the chapels of the society are considered valid, with the exception of Penance and Matrimony, which are, at best, doubtfully valid.		:: The Masses offered by priests of the society are valid. Other Sacraments celebrated in the chapels of the society are considered valid, with the exception of Penance and Matrimony, which are, at best, doubtfully valid.

	:: It is not clear that the society is in schism, and it is not properly called a “sect.~~â€~~ In recent years the Holy See has recognized the society's expressed desire for regular communion with the Roman Pontiff and the Church he shepherds, and the Holy See's dialogue with the society since 2009 demonstrates the Church's commitment to unity.		:: It is not clear that the society is in schism, and it is not properly called a “sect.” In recent years the Holy See has recognized the society's expressed desire for regular communion with the Roman Pontiff and the Church he shepherds, and the Holy See's dialogue with the society since 2009 demonstrates the Church's commitment to unity.

	:: It is necessary to distinguish between the priests, brothers, and sisters of the society, on the one hand; and the lay faithful who attend Mass at society chapels, on the other hand. The former are clearly in an irregular status. In regard to the lay faithful who attend Mass at society chapels, there has never been a statement by the Holy See that these people are in schism. In fact, the Holy See acts toward them as it does toward all the Catholic lay faithful.		:: It is necessary to distinguish between the priests, brothers, and sisters of the society, on the one hand; and the lay faithful who attend Mass at society chapels, on the other hand. The former are clearly in an irregular status. In regard to the lay faithful who attend Mass at society chapels, there has never been a statement by the Holy See that these people are in schism. In fact, the Holy See acts toward them as it does toward all the Catholic lay faithful.

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€™" to "'"

2022-12-10T09:21:15Z

Text replacement - "â€™" to "'"

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 10 December 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:: The Masses offered by priests of the society are valid. Other Sacraments celebrated in the chapels of the society are considered valid, with the exception of Penance and Matrimony, which are, at best, doubtfully valid.		:: The Masses offered by priests of the society are valid. Other Sacraments celebrated in the chapels of the society are considered valid, with the exception of Penance and Matrimony, which are, at best, doubtfully valid.

	:: It is not clear that the society is in schism, and it is not properly called a “sect.â€ In recent years the Holy See has recognized the ~~societyâ€™s~~ expressed desire for regular communion with the Roman Pontiff and the Church he shepherds, and the Holy ~~Seeâ€™s~~ dialogue with the society since 2009 demonstrates the ~~Churchâ€™s~~ commitment to unity.		:: It is not clear that the society is in schism, and it is not properly called a “sect.â€ In recent years the Holy See has recognized the society's expressed desire for regular communion with the Roman Pontiff and the Church he shepherds, and the Holy See's dialogue with the society since 2009 demonstrates the Church's commitment to unity.

	:: It is necessary to distinguish between the priests, brothers, and sisters of the society, on the one hand; and the lay faithful who attend Mass at society chapels, on the other hand. The former are clearly in an irregular status. In regard to the lay faithful who attend Mass at society chapels, there has never been a statement by the Holy See that these people are in schism. In fact, the Holy See acts toward them as it does toward all the Catholic lay faithful.		:: It is necessary to distinguish between the priests, brothers, and sisters of the society, on the one hand; and the lay faithful who attend Mass at society chapels, on the other hand. The former are clearly in an irregular status. In regard to the lay faithful who attend Mass at society chapels, there has never been a statement by the Holy See that these people are in schism. In fact, the Holy See acts toward them as it does toward all the Catholic lay faithful.

	:: ~~Itâ€™s~~ also necessary to distinguish between acts that are invalid and those that are illicit. Acts are illicit when they go against the ~~Churchâ€™s~~ law. Still, acts that are canonically illicit may be valid, and, in the case of the society, the ministerial acts of their priests may be illicit and still be considered valid by the Church.		:: It's also necessary to distinguish between acts that are invalid and those that are illicit. Acts are illicit when they go against the Church's law. Still, acts that are canonically illicit may be valid, and, in the case of the society, the ministerial acts of their priests may be illicit and still be considered valid by the Church.

	:: Finally, a comment should be made regarding the Sunday Mass obligation of Catholics. The faithful do not properly fulfill their Sunday Mass obligation in chapels of the society, as the celebration of the Eucharist presupposes not only communion with the Lord, but also communion with the Church He founded, and the hierarchy who govern the Church by Divine mandate.		:: Finally, a comment should be made regarding the Sunday Mass obligation of Catholics. The faithful do not properly fulfill their Sunday Mass obligation in chapels of the society, as the celebration of the Eucharist presupposes not only communion with the Lord, but also communion with the Church He founded, and the hierarchy who govern the Church by Divine mandate.

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€œ" to "“"

2022-12-10T09:21:09Z

Text replacement - "â€œ" to "“"

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 10 December 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:: The Masses offered by priests of the society are valid. Other Sacraments celebrated in the chapels of the society are considered valid, with the exception of Penance and Matrimony, which are, at best, doubtfully valid.		:: The Masses offered by priests of the society are valid. Other Sacraments celebrated in the chapels of the society are considered valid, with the exception of Penance and Matrimony, which are, at best, doubtfully valid.

	:: It is not clear that the society is in schism, and it is not properly called a ~~â€œsect~~.â€ In recent years the Holy See has recognized the societyâ€™s expressed desire for regular communion with the Roman Pontiff and the Church he shepherds, and the Holy Seeâ€™s dialogue with the society since 2009 demonstrates the Churchâ€™s commitment to unity.		:: It is not clear that the society is in schism, and it is not properly called a “sect.â€ In recent years the Holy See has recognized the societyâ€™s expressed desire for regular communion with the Roman Pontiff and the Church he shepherds, and the Holy Seeâ€™s dialogue with the society since 2009 demonstrates the Churchâ€™s commitment to unity.

	:: It is necessary to distinguish between the priests, brothers, and sisters of the society, on the one hand; and the lay faithful who attend Mass at society chapels, on the other hand. The former are clearly in an irregular status. In regard to the lay faithful who attend Mass at society chapels, there has never been a statement by the Holy See that these people are in schism. In fact, the Holy See acts toward them as it does toward all the Catholic lay faithful.		:: It is necessary to distinguish between the priests, brothers, and sisters of the society, on the one hand; and the lay faithful who attend Mass at society chapels, on the other hand. The former are clearly in an irregular status. In regard to the lay faithful who attend Mass at society chapels, there has never been a statement by the Holy See that these people are in schism. In fact, the Holy See acts toward them as it does toward all the Catholic lay faithful.

Mxmsj: Created page with " :; [http://www.catholicvirginian.org/archive/2013/2013vol88iss19/pages/article2.html "Diocesan statement regarding article on the Society of St. Pius X."] :: The Masses offe..."

2013-08-14T17:46:16Z

Created page with " :; [http://www.catholicvirginian.org/archive/2013/2013vol88iss19/pages/article2.html "Diocesan statement regarding article on the Society of St. Pius X."] :: The Masses offe..."

New page

:; [http://www.catholicvirginian.org/archive/2013/2013vol88iss19/pages/article2.html "Diocesan statement regarding article on the Society of St. Pius X."]

:: The Masses offered by priests of the society are valid. Other Sacraments celebrated in the chapels of the society are considered valid, with the exception of Penance and Matrimony, which are, at best, doubtfully valid.

:: It is not clear that the society is in schism, and it is not properly called a â€œsect.â€ In recent years the Holy See has recognized the societyâ€™s expressed desire for regular communion with the Roman Pontiff and the Church he shepherds, and the Holy Seeâ€™s dialogue with the society since 2009 demonstrates the Churchâ€™s commitment to unity.

:: It is necessary to distinguish between the priests, brothers, and sisters of the society, on the one hand; and the lay faithful who attend Mass at society chapels, on the other hand. The former are clearly in an irregular status. In regard to the lay faithful who attend Mass at society chapels, there has never been a statement by the Holy See that these people are in schism. In fact, the Holy See acts toward them as it does toward all the Catholic lay faithful.

:: Itâ€™s also necessary to distinguish between acts that are invalid and those that are illicit. Acts are illicit when they go against the Churchâ€™s law. Still, acts that are canonically illicit may be valid, and, in the case of the society, the ministerial acts of their priests may be illicit and still be considered valid by the Church.

:: Finally, a comment should be made regarding the Sunday Mass obligation of Catholics. The faithful do not properly fulfill their Sunday Mass obligation in chapels of the society, as the celebration of the Eucharist presupposes not only communion with the Lord, but also communion with the Church He founded, and the hierarchy who govern the Church by Divine mandate.

:; [http://canonlawmadeeasy.com/2013/08/01/are-sspx-sacraments-valid-part-i/ "Are SSPX Sacraments Valid?"]

:: As long as the Society [of Saint Pius X] does not have a canonical status in the Church, its ministers do not exercise legitimate ministries in the Churchâ€¦. In order to make this clear once again: until the doctrinal questions are clarified, the Society has no canonical status in the Church, and its ministers â€“ even though they have been freed of the ecclesiastical penalty â€“ do not legitimately exercise any ministry in the Church.

== References ==
<references />

== Links ==

[[Category:Schismatic Catholics]]

Society of St. Pius X - Revision history

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€“" to "-"

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€" to "”"

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€™" to "'"

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€œ" to "“"

Mxmsj: Created page with " :; [http://www.catholicvirginian.org/archive/2013/2013vol88iss19/pages/article2.html "Diocesan statement regarding article on the Society of St. Pius X."] :: The Masses offe..."

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€" to "”"